Special Counsel Jack Smith Calls Jim Jordan (T-OH4) Bluff: Will Testify In Open Hearing
-
‘Prosecute’ vs. ‘Persecute’ – Merriam-Webster
- “One you do in court, the other you do if you’re a jerk.”
- Federal: 2020 Election Interference, January 6 Insurrection
- My Dumb State, South Carolina: Attorney General Alan Wilson Thinks That Trying to Overthrow An Election and Incite An Insurrection Is Legal. @RalphHightower, 2024-11-01
Jack Smith ready to respond to GOP questions, but he wants the public to see his answers
Last week, Republican lawmakers tried to go on the offensive against the former special counsel. This week, he turned the tables and called their bluff.
Oct. 24, 2025, 8:55 AM EDT By Steve Benen
More than 10 months after then-special counsel Jack Smith grudgingly stepped down — the 2024 election results derailed his criminal cases against Donald Trump — the prosecutor remains a popular target for Republicans’ ire.
The president continues to peddle baseless attacks against the former special counsel; the Trump administration continues to push out officials who worked with Smith; and assorted Republican voices continue to go after Smith with unhinged and easily discredited conspiracy theories.
As for developments on Capitol Hill, GOP lawmakers remain eager to treat Smith like a punching bag. Rep Michael Rulli (T-OH6 this week baselessly accused accused the prosecutor of acts that he said bordered on “treason”; Sen. Marsha Blackburn (T-TN) referred Smith to the Justice Department for a misconduct investigation, based on misguided allegations the Tennessee Republican did not appear to understand; and several GOP members have even pushed for Smith’s disbarment.
To date, no Republican official has produced any evidence of Smith doing anything wrong. The party’s hysterics continue anyway.
Most recently, House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan (T-OH4) sent a letter to the former special counsel last week to demand his closed-door testimony. This week, Smith said he’s ready to respond to GOP questions — but he wants the public to see his answers. The New York Times reported:
Jack Smith, the former special counsel who twice indicted Trump, is asking for a public hearing following a summons from House Republicans to testify about his investigations. Smith’s lawyers — citing ‘many mischaracterizations’ made about his work — want to avoid a closed-door interview.
The Times’ report, which has been independently verified by MSNBC, added that Republicans on Capitol Hill “have privately been wary about having him appear in public, concerned he will undercut the president’s claims of innocence.”
Those concerns, of course, give away the game.
As we’ve discussed, Smith is an experienced, credible and capable prosecutor, who’s familiar with Trump’s criminal cases at a granular level. The more Republicans drag him back into the spotlight, the more Smith will be positioned to remind the public not only of the variety of alleged presidential felonies, but also of evidence the party would probably prefer to forget.
In other words, Jordan and his GOP colleagues sounded last week like they were going on the offensive against Smith, but now it’s Smith who’s calling their bluff. He’s not the one who needs to worry; they are.
“You want to talk?” the former special counsel effectively said. “Great. I have quite a bit to say. Let’s have a public conversation.”
Republicans have not yet said whether they’ll allow the transparency Smith clearly wants, although for the record, there’s no reason this Q&A would have to be held behind closed doors. Watch this space.
This post updates our related earlier coverage.
Steve Benen is a producer for “The Rachel Maddow Show,” the editor of MaddowBlog and an MSNBC political contributor. He’s also the bestselling author of “Ministry of Truth: Democracy, Reality, and the Republicans’ War on the Recent Past.”
- media
- MSNBC News - Breaking News and News Today / Latest News
- Axios - Breaking news, U.S. news and politics, and local news
- The New York Times (NYT) - Breaking News, US News, World News and Videos
- POLITICO - Politics, Policy, Political News
- The Daily Beast / The Latest in Politics, Media & Entertainment News
- The Hill - covering Congress, Politics, Political Campaigns and Capitol Hill
- Federal: 2020 Election Interference, January 6 Insurrection
- organizations
- political parties
- Democrat Party
- Trumpian Party
- universities
- companies
- foreign governments
- state, local governments
- federal government
- 2020 election interference
- January 6 2021 insurrection
- classified documents active hiding
-
Constitution of the United States
- U.S. Constitution - Article I / Library of Congress
- U.S. Constitution - Article II / Library of Congress
- U.S. Constitution - Article III / Library of Congress
- U.S. Constitution - Article IV / Library of Congress
- U.S. Constitution - Article V / Library of Congress
- U.S. Constitution - Article VI / Library of Congress
- U.S. Constitution - Article VII / Library of Congress
- U.S. Constitution - First Amendment / Library of Congress
- U.S. Constitution - Second Amendment / Library of Congress
- U.S. Constitution - Third Amendment / Library of Congress
- U.S. Constitution - Fourth Amendment / Library of Congress
- U.S. Constitution - Fifth Amendment / Library of Congress
- U.S. Constitution - Sixth Amendment / Library of Congress
- U.S. Constitution - Seventh Amendment / Library of Congress
- U.S. Constitution - Eighth Amendment / Library of Congress
- U.S. Constitution - Tenth Amendment / Library of Congress
- U.S. Constitution - Eleventh Amendment / Library of Congress
- U.S. Constitution - Twelfth Amendment / Library of Congress
- U.S. Constitution - Thirteenth Amendment / Library of Congress
- U.S. Constitution - Fourteenth Amendment / Library of Congress
- U.S. Constitution - Fifteenth Amendment / Library of Congress
- U.S. Constitution - Sixteenth Amendment / Library of Congress
- U.S. Constitution - Seventeenth Amendment / Library of Congress
U.S. Constitution - Eighteenth Amendment / Library of Congress- U.S. Constitution - Nineteenth Amendment / Library of Congress
- U.S. Constitution - Twentieth Amendment / Library of Congress
- U.S. Constitution - Twenty-First Amendment / Library of Congress
- U.S. Constitution - Twenty-Second Amendment / Library of Congress
- U.S. Constitution - Twenty-Third Amendment / Library of Congress
- U.S. Constitution - Twenty-Fourth Amendment / Library of Congress
- U.S. Constitution - Twenty-Fifth Amendment / Library of Congress
- U.S. Constitution - Twenty-Fifth Amendment / Library of Congress
- U.S. Constitution - Twenty-Sixth Amendment / Library of Congress
- U.S. Constitution - Twenty-Seventh Amendment / Library of Congress
- Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS)
- US Courts
- Department of Justice (DOJ)
- Federal Reserve
- Federal Reserve Board - Federal Reserve Act
- U.S. Department of the Treasury
- Congress
- 2024 Presidential Election Results – Federal Election Commission (FEC)
- President of the United States (POTUS)
- White House (WH)
- Trump autocracy
-
Donald J Trump
- President Donald Trump (45)
-
President Donald Trump (47)
- President Trump (47) Administration
-
President Trump (47) Cabinet
- press secretary
- Karoline Leavitt
- press secretary
-
Donald J Trump
- grifter
- self-dealing
- corruption
- con artist
- crime
- cryptocurrency
- criminal associates
- criminal businesses
- The Mar-a-Lago Club
- Trump International Golf Club
- Trump National Doral Golf Club
- Trump National Jupiter Golf Club
- Trump National Golf Club Washington, D.C.
- Trump National Golf Club Bedminster
- Trump National Golf Club Colts Neck
- Trump National Golf Club Philadelphia
- Trump National Golf Club Hudson Valley
- Trump National Golf Club Westchester
- Trump National Golf Club Los Angeles
- Trump International Golf Club Dubai
- Trump International Golf Links & Hotel Ireland, Doonbeg
- Trump MacLeod House & Lodge Scotland
- Trump Turnberry
- criminal media
- criminal organizations
- criminal partners