Trump’s Personal Attorney, Jeanine Pirro, Initiates Bogus Criminal Investigation Against Fed ChairJerome Powell
-
‘Prosecute’ vs. ‘Persecute’ – Merriam-Webster
- “One you do in court, the other you do if you’re a jerk.”
Prosecutors open investigation into Fed Chair Powell, sparking immediate backlash
Team Trump has embraced the idea that the levers of prosecutorial power are just another tool to be used against those who get in the president’s way.
Jan. 12, 2026, 8:00 AM EST By Steve Benen
Donald Trump spent much of 2025 publicly and privately lobbying his handpicked Federal Reserve chair, Jerome Powell, to lower interest rates. When the heavy-handed tactics didn’t have much of an effect, the president resorted to juvenile taunts and name-calling, publicly condemning Powell as (among many other things) a “moron” for failing to follow the White House’s misguided demands.
Two weeks ago, however, Trump’s position took a curious turn: He announced on Dec. 30 that his administration would “probably bring a lawsuit against” Powell.
That didn’t make a lot of sense — there were no grounds for such a case — but two weeks later, those comments became relevant anew. As it happens, the president didn’t bother pursuing some baseless civil suit against the Fed chair; instead, his team settled on a different legal tactic. The New York Times reported:
The U.S. attorney’s office in the District of Columbia,has opened a criminal investigation into Jerome H. Powell, the Federal Reserve chair, over the central bank’s renovation of its Washington headquarters and whether Mr. Powell lied to Congress about the scope of the project, according to officials briefed on the situation.
The inquiry, which includes an analysis of Mr. Powell’s public statements and an examination of spending records, was approved in November by Jeanine Pirro, a longtime ally of President Trump who was appointed to run the office last year, the officials said.
Around the time the news started to reach the public, Powell issued a roughly two-minute video statement statement, speaking directly to the camera, confirming that Trump’s Justice Department on Friday had served the Federal Reserve with grand jury subpoenas, threatening a criminal indictment.
Powell also explained the obvious motivation behind the developments: “The threat of criminal charges is a consequence of the Federal Reserve setting interest rates based on our best assessment of what will serve the public, rather than following the preferences of the president. This is about whether the Fed will be able to continue to set interest rates based on evidence and economic conditions, or whether instead monetary policy will be directed by political pressure or intimidation.”
The chair’s statement represented the initial pushback against Team Trump’s gambit, but additional elements soon followed. On Wall Street, for example, stock market futures fell, the dollar weakened, gold prices spiked, and the Vix index (sometimes referred to in financial circles as the “panic index”) jumped.
Let’s not forget that last spring when Trump talked openly about possibly firing Powell, markets dropped and the president quickly backed off, claiming he hadn’t said what everyone heard him say.
As the president’s DOJ eyes possible trumped-up, bad-faith criminal charges against Powell, the circumstances are far worse.
A political backlash is brewing too. Democratic leaders wasted little time in condemning the developments, but the pushback wasn’t entirely partisan. Sen. Thom Tillis (T-NC), a member of the Senate Banking Committee, said in a statement, “If there were any remaining doubt whether advisers within the Trump Administration are actively pushing to end the independence of the Federal Reserve, there should now be none. It is now the independence and credibility of the Department of Justice that are in question.”
Just as notably, the senator said he would “oppose the confirmation of any nominee for the Fed — including the upcoming Fed Chair vacancy — until this legal matter is fully resolved.”
But as important as these elements are, it’s worth appreciating the profound damage Trump and his team are doing to the rule of law as the dust settles on the news.
The White House hasn’t merely seized control of the Justice Department, it’s also embraced the idea that the levers of prosecutorial power are just another political tool to be used against those who bother Trump or get in his way.
The The list is long and growing. Trump has a problem with Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz? Prosecute him. New York Attorney General Letitia James tries to hold Trump accountable? Prosecute her. Former FBI Director James Comey upsets Trump? Prosecute him. Fed Governor Lisa Cook stands in the way of Trump’s agenda? Prosecute her.
The obvious corruption of the justice system is made worse by the fact that the White House isn’t making any meaningful effort to hide the corruption.
Trump doesn’t appear to be the least bit concerned about appearances or a pretense of propriety. He’s abusing the system. He knows he’s abusing the system. He knows that we know he’s abusing the system — but he’s doing it anyway.
It’s easy to believe that Trump and his confederates aren’t hiding their weaponization of the criminal justice system because they want everyone to notice. They need federal officials and White House critics to be afraid, and other federal prosecutors to understand that they’ll soon be unemployed unless they play ball with the Republican agenda.
The corruption is the point.
There might be half-hearted denials, issued with winks and nods, but by design, everyone should be painfully aware of what is plainly true: The authoritarian crisis has arrived, and it’s getting worse. We now live in a country where the president’s opponents are pursued by prosecutors in brazen displays of partisan power.
This post updates our related earlier coverage.
Steve Benen is a producer for “The Rachel Maddow Show,” the editor of MaddowBlog and an MS NOW political contributor. He’s also the bestselling author of “Ministry of Truth: Democracy, Reality, and the Republicans’ War on the Recent Past.”
District of Columbia Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs
Statement from Federal Reserve Chair Jerome H. Powell - Federal Reserve Board
January 11, 2026
Good evening.
On Friday, the Department of Justice served the Federal Reserve with grand jury subpoenas, threatening a criminal indictment related to my testimony before the Senate Banking Committee last June. That testimony concerned in part a multi-year project to renovate historic Federal Reserve office buildings.
I have deep respect for the rule of law and for accountability in our democracy. No one—certainly not the chair of the Federal Reserve—is above the law. But this unprecedented action should be seen in the broader context of the administration’s threats and ongoing pressure.
This new threat is not about my testimony last June or about the renovation of the Federal Reserve buildings. It is not about Congress’s oversight role; the Fed through testimony and other public disclosures made every effort to keep Congress informed about the renovation project. Those are pretexts. The threat of criminal charges is a consequence of the Federal Reserve setting interest rates based on our best assessment of what will serve the public, rather than following the preferences of the President.
This is about whether the Fed will be able to continue to set interest rates based on evidence and economic conditions—or whether instead monetary policy will be directed by political pressure or intimidation.
I have served at the Federal Reserve under four administrations, Republicans and Democrats alike. In every case, I have carried out my duties without political fear or favor, focused solely on our mandate of price stability and maximum employment. Public service sometimes requires standing firm in the face of threats. I will continue to do the job the Senate confirmed me to do, with integrity and a commitment to serving the American people.
Thank you.
Last Update: January 11, 2026
- media
- MS NOW - Breaking News and News Today / Latest News
- ‘Prosecute’ vs. ‘Persecute’ – Merriam-Webster
- The New York Times (NYT) - Breaking News, US News, World News and Videos
- POLITICO - Politics, Policy, Political News
- Reuters / Breaking International News & Views
- The Wall Street Journal (WSJ) - Breaking News, Business, Financial & Economic News, World News and Video
- political parties
- Democrat Party
- Trumpian Party
- state, local governments
- Minnesota
- New York
- Trump’s perceived enemies
- James B. Comey, September 4, 2013 - May 9, 2017 — FBI
- Letitia James / New York State Attorney General
- Adam Schiff (D-CA)
- federal government
- Constitution of the United States
- Trump autocracy
-
Donald J Trump
- President Donald Trump (45)
-
President Donald Trump (47)
- President Trump (47) Administration
- President Trump (47) Cabinet
- Director Kash Patel — FBI
-
Donald J Trump
- grifter
- self-dealing
- corruption
- con artist
- crime
- cryptocurrency
- criminal associates
- criminal businesses
- criminal media
- criminal organizations
- criminal partners
Related Posts
- 2026-01-12: World Stock Market Closing Indexes: Americas (Strong Gains). Europe, Middle East, & Africa (Moderate Gains). Asia Pacific (Strong Gains).
- Typical Divisionist Language From Trump Administration Regarding Murder of Minneapolis Resident Renee Good
- Your Rights Regarding Encounters With Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE)