Hypergolic Hill Hijinks: Jim Jordan Ignites Oversight Fireworks in Trumpworld’s Wildest Sideshow
Flamethrower Jim Jordan (T-OH4) and organ grinder with monkey extraordinaire files a baseless criminal complaint against Jack Smith to the Department of Justice for criminal persecution1.
Jack Smith’s reputation as a prosecuting attorney is unassailable.
Rep. Jim Jordan refers Jack Smith to DOJ for potential criminal investigation
The House Judiciary chairman accused the former special counsel of making false statements about his 2020 election probe. The referral does not require the Justice Department to prosecute.
Jul. 22, 2026, 11:45 PM EDT By Mychael Schnell and Carla Herreria
House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan referred former special counsel Jack Smith to the Department of Justice on Wednesday for a potential criminal investigation, accusing Smith of intentionally making false statements to Congress last year.
In his letter to acting Attorney General Todd Blanche, Jordan alleged that there is “strong evidence” that Smith “made willfully and intentionally false statements” in a closed-door deposition Dec. 17. Specifically, the Ohio Republican pointed to Smith’s answers to questions about whether prosecutors obtained phone records of members of Congress during his investigation into efforts to overturn the 2020 election.
During the deposition, Smith testified that he did not seek search warrants for the contents of any text messages from members of Congress during his investigation, and only sought toll records. However, in his letter to Blanche, Jordan noted that documents the Justice Department produced this month show Smith’s team obtained text messages from 44 lawmakers.
“The responses provided by Mr. Smith gave the impression that neither Mr. Smith nor his team had access to the content of Members’ privileged text messages,” Jordan wrote in the referral. “We now know this to be false.”
In their response letter to the department, Smith’s attorneys called the referral “meritless” and based on a “spurious claim” that the former special counsel gave false testimony not because of anything he said, but because he didn’t volunteer that his team had, in fact, obtained text messages from some members of Congress simply by pulling them from the National Archives.
A congressional criminal referral is a nonbinding request asking the Justice Department to investigate whether someone has violated federal law and to determine whether further action is needed. The DOJ is not required to pursue charges or even open an investigation.
Rep. Jamie Raskin, the ranking member of the committee, denounced the referral, saying in a statement that Republicans “have embarrassed themselves again in this investigation.”
“It seems Republican Members of Congress are lashing out because they just realized their communications with the White House became presidential records preserved at the National Archives as required by the Presidential Records Act,” the Maryland Democrat said.
“This referral deliberately distorts and misstates the facts, including what questions the Republicans actually asked at Mr. Smith’s interview.”
As special counsel under the Biden administration, Smith brought two federal criminal cases against President Donald Trump, including one accusing him of conspiring to overturn the results of the 2020 election. Smith dropped both cases after Trump won the 2024 presidential election, citing longstanding Justice Department policy against prosecuting a sitting president.
Read the criminal referral below:
Rep. Jim Jordan’s Referral of Jack Smith / DocumentCloud
Read the response from Smith’s attorney team below:
Jack Smith’s Attorney Response to Jim Jordan Referral / DocumentCloud
Mychael Schnell is a reporter for MS NOW.
Carla Herreria is an editor for MS NOW’s breaking news and liveblog team. She was previously a senior assignment editor at HuffPost.,
- media
- MS NOW - Breaking News and News Today / Latest News
- Federal: 2020 Election Interference, January 6 Insurrection ⛓️💥
- keywords
- Jordan (T-OH4), Jim
- Judiciary
- The Chairman / House Judiciary Committee Republicans
- Department of Justice (DOJ)
- “criminal referral”
- ‘Prosecute’ vs. ‘Persecute’ – Merriam-Webster
- Trump’s enemies
- Department of Justice / Special Counsel Jack Smith
- 2020 Presidential Election Results – Federal Election Commission (FEC)
- 2024 Presidential Election Results – Federal Election Commission (FEC)
- Federal: 2020 Election Interference, January 6 Insurrection ⛓️💥
- organizations
- political parties
- Democrat Party
- Trumpian Party
- Home - Ohio Republican Party
- The Maryland Democratic Party
- federal government
-
Constitution of the United States
- 44 USC Ch. 22: PRESIDENTIAL RECORDS
- 2020 Presidential Election Results – Federal Election Commission (FEC)
- 2024 Presidential Election Results – Federal Election Commission (FEC)
- Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS)
- Department of Justice (DOJ)
- Federal Reserve
- U.S. Department of the Treasury
- National Archives
- Congress
- President of the United States (POTUS)
- White House (WH)
- Trump autocracy
-
Donald J Trump
- President Donald Trump (45)
-
President Donald Trump (47)
- President Trump (47) Administration
-
President Trump (47) Cabinet
- Vice President JD Vance
- JD Vance / LinkedIn
- Susie Wiles
- press secretary
- Karoline Leavitt
- Todd Blanche – Office of the Attorney General / Meet the Acting Attorney General / United States Department of Justice
- Scott Bessent / U.S. Department of the Treasury
-
Pam Bondi – Office of the Attorney General / Meet the Attorney General / United States Department of Justice - Director Kash Patel — FBI
-
Donald J Trump
- grifter
- self-dealing
- corruption
- con artist
- crime
- cryptocurrency
- criminal associates
- criminal businesses
- criminal media
- criminal organizations
- criminal partners
-
‘Prosecute’ vs. ‘Persecute’ – Merriam-Webster: “One you do in court, the other you do if you’re a jerk.” ↩
Related Posts
- It Ain't Easy to Turn a Flying Palace Into a Flying Fortress For King Trump
- 2026-08-10: World Stock Market Closing Indexes: Americas (Moderate Losses, Small Pos). Europe, Middle East, & Africa (Mixed, Small Neg). Asia, Pacific (Strong Gains, Small Pos). Defense ETFs (Moderate Gains, Small Pos). Energy ETFs (Moderate Gains, Medium Pos).